KONSEPSI PENILAIAN GURU PRA-JABATAN DI PEMATANGSIANTAR
Keywords:
Konsepsi; Penilaian; Guru; Pra-Jabatan.Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian survei kuantitatif ini adalah untuk mengetahui konsepsi penilaian tiga kelompok guru prajabatan yang berbeda (guru kelas, guru mata pelajaran, dan guru berkebutuhan khusus). Konsepsi penilaian paling baik digambarkan melalui tiga faktor utama yaitu penilaian pembelajaran, penilaian untuk belajar mengajar, dan penilaian sebagai tindakan yang merugikan. Faktor-faktor utama ini dikelompokkan ke dalam tiga profil konsep penilaian-penilaian hati-hati, penilaian positif, dan penilaian kritis. Guru prajabatan berkebutuhan khusus menunjukkan konsepsi yang lebih berorientasi pada penilaian yang menekankan pada penilaian pembelajaran dan penilaian pembelajaran dibandingkan kelompok guru prajabatan lainnya. Namun, dalam setiap kelompok calon guru, konsep penilaian yang ada bervariasi dari penilaian positif hingga penilaian hati-hati dan bahkan penilaian kritis. Hasilnya dibahas untuk menyarankan pengembangan dalam pendidikan guru secara khusus di Pematangsiantar.
Downloads
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2012. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
Black, P., and D. William. 2018. “Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (6): 551–575.
Brown, G., A. Gebril, and M. Michaelides. 2019. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: A Global Phenomenon or A Global Localism.” Frontiers in Education 4. doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00016.
Crossman, J. 2007. “The Role of Relationships and Emotions in Student Perceptions of Learning and Assessment.” Higher Education Research and Development 26: 313–327.
Daniels, L. M., and C. A. Poth. 2017. “Relationships between Pre-service Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment, Approaches to Instruction, and Assessment: An Achievement Goal Theory Perspective.” Educational Psychology 37 (7): 835–853. doi:10.1080/01443410.2017.1293800..
Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2005. “Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning.” Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1: 3–31.
Hill, M. F., and G. Eyers. 2016. “Moving from Student to Teacher: Changing Perspectives about Assessment through Teacher Education.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by G. T. L. Brown and L. R. Harris, 103–128. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lutovac, S., and M. A. Flores. 2021. “Conceptions of Assessment in Pre-service Teachers’ Narratives of Students’ Failure.” Cambridge Journal of Education. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2021.1935736.
Remesal, A. 2011. “Primary and Secondary Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: A Qualitative Study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27: 472–482.
Siegel, M. A., and C. Wissehr. 2011. “Preparing for the Plunge: Pre-service Teachers’ Assessment Literacy.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 22 (4): 371–391. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9231-6.
Takala, M., E. Silfver, Y. Karlsson, and M. Saarinen. 2018. “Supporting Pupils in Finnish and Swedish Schools —teachers’ Views.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. doi:10.1080/ 00313831.2018.1541820.
Xu, Y., and L. He. 2019. “How Pre-service Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment Change over Practicum: Implications for Teacher Assessment Literacy.” Frontiers in Education 4: 1–16. doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00145.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rosben Sihombing, Esther Sitorus; Osco Parmonangan Sijabat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
